{"id":168,"date":"2022-08-14T21:03:48","date_gmt":"2022-08-14T19:03:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.tribunal-nature.org\/blog\/derniere-actualite-toute-fraiche-trump-lawyer-told-justice-dept-that-classified-material-had-been-returned\/"},"modified":"2022-08-14T21:03:48","modified_gmt":"2022-08-14T19:03:48","slug":"derniere-actualite-toute-fraiche-trump-lawyer-told-justice-dept-that-classified-material-had-been-returned","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tribunal-nature.org\/blog\/derniere-actualite-toute-fraiche-trump-lawyer-told-justice-dept-that-classified-material-had-been-returned\/","title":{"rendered":"Derni\u00e8re actualit\u00e9 toute fraiche : Trump Lawyer Told Justice Dept. That Classified Material Had Been Returned"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
En consultant internet notre \u00e9quipe a d\u00e9couvert un texte qui risque de vous plaire. Son propos est \u00ab\u00a0la justice\u00a0\u00bb.<\/p>\n
Le titre troublant (Trump Lawyer Told Justice Dept. That Classified Material Had Been Returned) r\u00e9capitule tout l\u2019article.<\/p>\n
Pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 sous le nom \u00abd\u2019anonymat \n\u00bb, l\u2019\u00e9crivain est connu et fiable pour plusieurs autres encarts qu\u2019il a publi\u00e9s sur internet.<\/p>\n
Vous pouvez par cons\u00e9quent faire confiance aux infos qu\u2019il divulgue.<\/p>\n
L\u2019encart a \u00e9t\u00e9 diffus\u00e9 \u00e0 une date not\u00e9e 2022-08-14 09:18:00.<\/p>\n
L\u2019article mentionn\u00e9 : <\/p>\n
\n
At least one lawyer for former President Donald Trump signed a written statement in June asserting that all material marked as classified and held in boxes in a storage area at Trump\u2019s Mar-a-Lago residence and club had been returned to the government, four people with knowledge of the document said.<\/p>\n
The written declaration was made after a visit June 3 to Mar-a-Lago by Jay I. Bratt, the top counterintelligence official in the Justice Department\u2019s national security division.<\/p>\n
The existence of the signed declaration, which has not previously been reported, is a possible indication that Trump or his team were not fully forthcoming with federal investigators about the material. And it could help explain why a potential violation of a criminal statute related to obstruction was cited by the department as one basis for seeking the warrant used to carry out the daylong search of the former president\u2019s home Monday, an extraordinary step that generated political shock waves.<\/p>\n
Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times<\/p>\n
It also helps to further explain the sequence of events that prompted the Justice Department\u2019s decision to conduct the search after months in which it had tried to resolve the matter through discussions with Trump and his team.<\/p>\n
An inventory of the material taken from Trump\u2019s home that was released Friday showed that FBI agents seized 11 sets of documents during the search with some type of confidential or secret marking on them, including some marked as \u201cclassified\/TS\/SCI\u201d \u2014 shorthand for \u201ctop secret\/sensitive compartmented information.\u201d Information categorized in that fashion is meant to be viewed only in a secure government facility.<\/p>\n
The search encompassed not just the storage area where boxes of material known to the Justice Department were being held but also Trump\u2019s office and residence. The search warrant and inventory unsealed Friday did not specify where in the Mar-a-Lago complex the documents marked as classified were found.<\/p>\n